The Special Olympics Got Game Too

March 9th, 2010

Eunice Kennedy Shriver passed away on Tuesday August 11,2009. She was the founder of the Special Olympics and a lifetime advocate for people with intellectual disabilities. The Special Olympics is a movement of sports training and athletic competition for those that have intellectual disabilities. Shriver believed that people with intellectual disabilities deserve the same opportunities and experiences as others.

No matter what the disability, a person still has a talent, a skill, and a gift to give to the world when encouraged doing so. Using sports as a display of abilities brings about respect, acceptance and inclusion. Persons with disabilities benefit by seeing in themselves that they too have talents and it helps them to feel better about themselves. It also serves as a teaching tool to those who may have thought that disabled people were useless until they were afforded the opportunities to witness their grand performances.

The venue of sports has a way of bringing people together from all walks of life, nationalities, cultures, races and backgrounds. Along with the exercises, discipline and vigorous training that it takes to be athletically fit to play a specific sport; building character, strength, strong muscles, and team work.

No wonder the Bible is full of metaphors that compare the Christian life to that of an athlete. Since everyone seems to be able to relate to sports, God used these metaphors to help us understand the Christian life. No matter what physical or mental state we are in, we all have talents, skills, and gifts that have been given to us by God. But many times we are not encouraged to use them or to even find out what they are. Which is especially frustrating for those that have disabilities. Instead we must go after them, train, and master our skills like an athlete does for his specific sport. Athletes know what their talents and skills are and will train in that specific sport. Some people spend their time going after a talent that they do not have because they like it. Or because someone else has the talent that they want. But not athletes, they will not train in a sport that they do not have the talent for. They are content with their own God given abilities and not the abilities that someone else has. They know that they can find their significance and place in society by using their own God given talents and skills. Which is what Eunice Kennedy Shriver did to help the intellectually disabled find their significance through the Special Olympics.

The Jihaz in Islamic marriages

March 5th, 2010

Jihaz (dowry) or trousseau is the amount of clothes, household linen, furniture and other belongings contributed by the bride and/or her family to the marriage. It has to be distinguished from the mahr, which is an agreement between the wali (guardian) of the bride and her future husband by which the groom pays certain sum of money or its equivalent to the bride at the signing of the marriage agreement. The mahr is an obligation on the groom stipulated by the Quran to be given to the future wife, while the jihaz is not an obligation on the part of the bride or her family. (For more information on the mahr agreement.

The Jihaz is not the nafaqa (support) either, because nafaqa is the material support given by the husband to his wife as soon as the marriage is consummated. The nafaqa covers clothing, food and shelter of the wife. (For more on the nafaqa.

In the Middle East , as elsewhere, the brides are often given house furnishings and clothing by their parents or family members when embarking on marriage. There is no obligation in the Islamic Shari’a to fulfill the jihaz, however, in most cases, brides bring such jihaz to their houses once they get married.

Consequently, the groom cannot force his future wife to bring the jihaz as part of the household, and if her family is asked to contribute such jihaz, they may decline the demand.

Once the jihaz is given to the bride, it becomes her own property. Her family cannot claim it as part of their estate unless the jihaz was given as a loan agreement to the bride. Under such circumstance, they may demand the return of the jihaz.

The groom cannot have claim on the jihaz, unless it was purchased by the bride or her family, with monies given by the groom as part of the mahr agreement, where the jihaz becomes a mahr and therefore belongs to the groom.

The bride’s father may have a legal agreement with his daughter stating that certain pieces of the jihaz she took with her upon marriage were in fact a loan, and therefore revert to her family upon death. Otherwise the jihaz is considered a private property of the bride and becomes part of her estate.

The jihaz contributed by the bride and /or her family endorses the idea that she enters into marriage as an empowered individual. The marriage arrangements in the Middle East involving jihaz, predated the rise of Islam.

There is no provision in Islamic Shari’a that forbids the exercise of women’s right to contribute jihaz to their marriages. In fact, under Islamic law, married women have legal rights to share in family estate. They may own properties, or be named as beneficiaries of religious waqf (endowment) assets.

Gabriel Sawma is a lawyer with Middle East background, professor of Middle East Constitutional Law, Islamic Shari’a, Arabic and Aramaic. Expert Consultant in matters related to recognition and enforcement of Islamic divorce, child custody, banking and finance in US courts. Admitted to the Lebanese Bar Association; Associate Member of the New York State Bar and the American Bar Associations. Editor of http://www.gabrielsawma.blogspot.com

Author of the Aramaic Language of the Qur’an http://www.syriacaramaicquran.com

Author of an upcoming book on Islamic Divorce in US Courts.

Email: gabrielsawma@yahoo.com , gabygms@gmail.com

Republishing and reprinting this article is hereby granted by the author.

Does the Government Advocate Debt Settlement?

March 1st, 2010

Some people wonder whether debt settlement is a safe or wise course of action. For those who look to the government provide advice on how to get back on their feet, the question is simple: does the government advocate debt settlement. The answer is equally simple: a resounding yes. Since the worldwide economic crisis has been increasing in severity, the government has created programs to help people get fair and helpful debt settlements. In fact, the FDIC regulates bank debt settlement to prevent unfair and deceptive practices from harming consumers who need to get out of debt.

The Economic Crisis Necessitates Debt Settlement

The fact is people are having a harder and harder time making ends meet these days. Many people are finding it necessary to seek outside help in dealing with crushing debt problems. Wages are going down, layoffs are becoming more common, and it seems that everything is becoming more expensive. Sometimes there’s no way out of the situation other than bankruptcy or debt settlement. While the law does allow you to file bankruptcy, the government does not advocate it because it damages the economy by forcing all involved parties to take a greater loss than they might otherwise have to. With debt settlement, the amount of that loss can be mitigated. You get to keep your assets and your creditors take a smaller loss on their investments.

Government Programs Help With Debt Settlement

The FDIC has programs that help certain consumers negotiate mortgage loan modifications. A mortgage loan modification is a type of debt settlement which is applied to home mortgage loans. Like other forms of debt settlement, this involves and agreement with the creditor to lower the total amount of money owed and accept less instead of nothing. These government programs are helpful to many, but may not be available to everyone because of their narrow qualification guidelines. In addition, debt settlement does not always have to involve a mortgage loan. There are many types of debts that can be addressed with a debt settlement program, from credit card debt to business loans.

Applying the FDIC’s Strategy to Your Situation

The federal government has advised banks and other lending organizations to consider debt settlement as a favorable alternative to increasingly harsh collection action. Though you may not qualify for government help in this area, it could still be a good idea to get help from another company or entity. There are many organizations in existence that can offer assistance in negotiating a debt settlement agreement between you and your creditors. If you think you may benefit from such action, research the programs available to people in your area and contact a debt settlement professional today to determine what your best options for debt relief are. If debt settlement is recommended, make sure you are dealing with a reputable and accredited organization before proceeding. If you act cautiously and do your homework, debt settlement can help save you from years of crushing financial burdens you can’t possibly meet.

Bible Heresy And The Individual’s Paradigm

February 28th, 2010

There’s no bigger problem in ones study of the biblical writings than ones hermeneutics. Simply defined, hermeneutics is the science of scripture interpretation. What affects our hermeneutics, however, is our paradigm. In fact, if we all had the same paradigm, same IQ, and spent the same amount of time.

in our study of the writings, we would all draw the same conclusions. But, alas, God never made clones, people do that.

It was the Jewish paradigm that kept the majority of them from entering the Anointed’s kingdom. Jesus addressed it when he said, “No man puts new wine in old wine skins.” He knew that a new paradigm was necessary if they were going to be able to accept him.

Since we all obtained our paradigms from authority figures in our life such as parents, teachers, coaches and preachers, they rule our basic precepts and value systems. Let me quote Kuhn and Philip E Johnson.

“A paradigm is not merely a hypothesis, which can be discarded if it fails a single experimental test. It is a way of looking at the world, or some part of it, and scientists understand even the anomalies in its terms. According to Kuhn, anomalies by themselves never falsify a paradigm, because its defenders can resort to ad hoc hypotheses to accommodate any potentially disconfirming evidence. A paradigm rules until it is replaced by another paradigm… Kuhn described experimental evidence showing that ordinary people tend to see what they have been trained to see, and fail to see what they know ought not to be present. The finest scientists are no exception. On the contrary, because they are dependent upon inferences and upon observations that are difficult to make, they are particularly prone to paradigm-influenced misperception.”

Let me emphasize two major points of the above quote. 1) “…anomalies (things that don’t fit) by themselves never falsify a paradigm..”

When we hear things that do not fit what we’ve been taught as gospel, our tendency is to reject it out of hand. Our brain shuts down and refuses to consider the subject. The reason is simple. If we considered the subject we might be forced into changing our paradigm and that would be painful. No one likes change, especially to his way of thinking.

Jesus actually explained the problem the Jews had with new wine skins. Their attitude was simple, “. …the old is BETTER.” (Luke 5:36-39, emphasis mine)

That really explains the problem, doesn’t it? It’s not a question of whether the old is right, it’s just better. it’s comfortable. It’s traditional. It’s simple, It is the way things ought to be and remain. This explains why the Jews rejected Jesus outright. He simply didn’t conform to their paradigm — their idea of what the Messiah was supposed to be.

2) “…ordinary people tend to see what they have been trained to see, and fail to see what they know ought not to be present…”

I’m afraid Kuhn was being a little arrogant as he talks about “ordinary people” as if these exist in some unknown Eden, extraordinary people unaffected by paradigms. Such people do not exist in this reality. However, what he said is certainly true. People do tend to see what they’ve always been taught to believe and are generally blind to things that shouldn’t be included.

Simply put, paradigms can be real killers when it comes to truth seeking and our paradigm concerning biblical things is especially deadly. If this isn’t true, then why all the diverse religions in Christianity and the splintering even among the sects themselves? You can imagine how ridiculous all this division must appear in the eyes of unbelievers

And consider the extremes measures that paradigms have led to today and historically. The militant Islamic view that states that the United States is the great Satan and the world would be a better place if Americans were dead. So we see the destruction of the Twin Towers and attacks against Americans

everywhere. This paradigm is taught to their children and accepted. We consider them crazy and yet we are influenced just as deeply by our own paradigms.

One must remember, a person’s paradigm speaks nothing to whether the view is true or false, only that it is pervasive in our thinking. This pervasiveness is what makes it difficult in the extreme to examine closely another’s point of view. That’s why you here the old saw, “I will discuss anything but politics and religion.”

It was the influence of paradigm that inspired the Great Spanish Inquisition, resulting in the torturing and burning at the stake “heretics” across the European continent. In the examples already mentioned, militant Islam and “inquisitive” Christianity, the penalty was death to those that dared not share the pervasive paradigm.

Even in this land of religious tolerance you have the sordid example of a paradigm run amok in the Salem witch hunt in Massachusetts. We could multiply examples but you get the point.
In today’s evangelical religious atmosphere, heretics are “burned at the stake” by snubbing, excommunication, separation and any other means deemed appropriate by the majority view. After all, isn’t that what heresy is, going against the grain of the majority.

If we are going to be different and a truth seeker, we are going to have to examine our belief system carefully. We must ask ourselves where the fountain of our paradigm sprang. Did we arrive by independent and careful thought and study? Have we ever believed something to be true and later found out it wasn’t? We must be willing to step out of our paradigms without hanging our brains on the wall..

I will make a personal confession here. After having put in hundreds and hundreds of hours of bible study and years of authoritatively pontificating on many themes, I discovered I had been wrong about a great many things. I had accepted as true things that had guided and influenced my personal study and interpretation. I believed many untruths because they had “preached good” and were spoken by men I admired and wanted to emulate. I had laid a foundation upon the sand and I was truly appalled at the resultant collapse. Sigh.. Oh the strength and power of paradigms.

You may be a beginner in your search for biblical truth or you may have been around the sun a few more times like some, but it is never too late to consider your own paradigm. You can do better.

John
http://biblemaverick.com